ArticleNeuropsychologia2026
The neural correlates of novel versus familiar metaphors in healthy young adults: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite extensive investigation, the neural correlates of metaphor processing remain debated. Poor theoretical and experimental control of variables that drive metaphor activation-particularly the constructs of novelty and familiarity-may be the reason for past discrepancies between studies. To address this issue, we used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to investigate how neural activation varies by sentence type (metaphorical versus literal sentences) and novelty (completely novel versus familiarized phrases) in 28 young adults without known neurological or psychiatric diagnoses. Activity was significantly greater for metaphorical over literal sentences in the bilateral inferior frontal gyrus, pars triangularis (IFGtri), left inferior parietal cortex, right IFG, pars opercularis (RIFGop), and right angular gyrus (RAG). Novel metaphors to which participants had no prior exposure had significantly higher (albeit weak) effects within RIFGop and right middle temporal gyrus (RMTG) compared to metaphors to which participants were exposed just prior to the fNIRS experiment. Pre-exposed, more familiar metaphors significantly activated a wider network of regions compared to completely novel metaphors, including bilateral middle frontal gyrus (MFG), bilateral IFGtri, and LMTG. A greater response time difference between conditions was associated with less LMFG activity for metaphors over literal sentences, but this effect had weak explanatory power. Taken together, these findings suggest that metaphors-particularly novel metaphors-somewhat engage right hemisphere cortex more than other phrase types (literal sentences, more familiar metaphors) but depend primarily on a distributed network of canonical language and domain-general multiple demand network regions, consistent with current neuropragmatic frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42632559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.