ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2026
On the edge: pathology specimen quality in robotic and laparoscopic proctectomy, a propensity score-matched study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough robotic surgery has seen increasing adoption over time, its benefits over conventional laparoscopy for rectal cancer resection remain unclear. This study compares composite pathologic specimen quality and overall survival between robotic and laparoscopic proctectomy in a national sample of patients with rectal cancer.
methodsUsing the National Cancer Database (2010-2021), we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with stage I to III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic proctectomy. The primary outcome was an optimal composite pathologic specimen, defined as R0 resection margins and the harvest of at least 12 lymph nodes. Propensity score matching balanced baseline covariates, and a Poisson regression model estimated the likelihood of obtaining an optimal specimen. Five-year overall survival was examined using Kaplan-Meier curves.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, 18,437 patients were included in each cohort. Robotic proctectomy was significantly more likely to yield an optimal composite pathologic specimen (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05), with lower rates of positive margins (4.5% vs 5.0%; P =.04) and insufficient lymph node yield (19.3% vs 21.9%; P <.001). The 5-year overall survival rate was similar between the groups (82.2% robotic vs 81.9% laparoscopic; P =.54).
conclusionRobotic proctectomy was slightly more likely than laparoscopy to yield an optimal composite pathologic specimen, whereas both approaches achieved similar long-term survival. It remains uncertain whether these marginal differences are attributable to technical factors or other influences; future studies should identify which patients derive the greatest benefit from a robotic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.