ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Influence of total knee arthroplasty on coronal plane phenotypes and associated clinical outcomes: a CPAK-based comparison between mechanical and functional alignment.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical alignment (MA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) pursues a neutral mechanical axis but may alter constitutional coronal morphology and require soft-tissue release. Functional alignment (FA), by contrast, is a soft-tissue-respecting strategy that achieves balance through individualized adjustment of implant position and bone resection, with little or no ligament release. The coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification, based on arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO), categorizes coronal knee phenotypes into nine types and may help evaluate how alignment philosophy influences phenotype and outcomes. This study compared MA and FA with respect to CPAK classification, phenotype transition, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after TKA. We retrospectively reviewed 271 primary TKAs, including 138 MA and 133 FA knees. Preoperative and postoperative CPAK classifications were determined on full-length standing radiographs. CPAK distribution, phenotype preservation, and transition patterns were compared between groups. PROMs were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Exploratory subgroup analyses were performed separately according to postoperative CPAK phenotype change status and alignment philosophy. Type I was the most common preoperative CPAK phenotype in both groups (MA, 63.0%; FA, 45.9%). Postoperatively, type IV predominated in MA (37.7%), whereas type V predominated in FA (42.1%). CPAK phenotype remained unchanged in 18.8% of MA knees and 22.6% of FA knees. FA achieved a higher OKS than MA (43.0 vs. 41.0, p<0.001), while FJS-12 and VAS were comparable. In exploratory subgroup analyses, higher postoperative OKS associated with FA was observed among patients younger than 65 years and among knees with postoperative CPAK phenotype change. Compared with conventional manual MA-TKA, robot-assisted FA-TKA was associated with different postoperative CPAK transition patterns and higher postoperative OKS. These findings suggest that alignment philosophy influences postoperative coronal phenotype patterns, although the clinical implications of specific phenotype transitions require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42631911What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.