ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2026
Testing the use of local large language models to extract trauma identification and contextualize posttraumatic stress symptoms from self-report.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate contextualization of trauma is critical for assessing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in behavioral health contexts, yet standard self-reports often fail to link symptoms to specific index traumas. This study evaluated the feasibility of using a local, privacy-preserving Large Language Model (LLM) to extract trauma exposure types from free-text narratives and evaluate their association with PTSD symptoms for description and prediction. Participants (N = 109) recruited online via Prolific as part of a larger study completed an extended Life Events Checklist (LEC) with up to three free-text trauma descriptions, and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). A local LLM was prompted to extract trauma types, which were compared with trauma categorizations generated by two expert clinical psychologists. Results indicated variable agreement; the LLM demonstrated high specificity (> 85% for most trauma types) and strong agreement for more frequently reported experiences, such as sexual assault (κ = 0.68-0.74). Cluster analysis based on LLM-derived features revealed significant differences in total PCL-5 scores (p = .04) across clusters. Findings suggest local LLMs can effectively extract clinically relevant features from brief trauma descriptions. While refinement is needed, this approach offers preliminary evidence for a scalable and secure method to augment PTSD screening in behavioral medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42631898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.