Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631884›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2026

Photobiomodulation therapy and postoperative recovery after abdominoplasty: a non-randomized pilot study.

Carmen Lucia Kretiska Araujo, Graziele Silveira Fardin, Ana Paula Bernardi, Joane Severo Ribeiro, Ricardo Vitiello Schramm, Isadora Frois Ourique, Maria Luiza Santos, Betina Vescovi, Tássio Fernando Crusius, Flávia Marafon and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carmen Lucia Kretiska AraujoUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Graziele Silveira FardinUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ana Paula BernardiUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Joane Severo RibeiroUniversidade Federal de Jataí, Jatai, Brazil.
Ricardo Vitiello SchrammUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Isadora Frois OuriqueUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Maria Luiza SantosUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Betina VescoviUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Tássio Fernando CrusiusUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Flávia MarafonUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Denis ValenteUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6101-5087
Níveo SteffenUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Patricia Viana da RosaUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Alessandra PeresUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil. peres@ufcspa.edu.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has been proposed as a non-invasive therapeutic strategy to support wound healing and modulate oxidative and inflammatory responses. However, clinical data evaluating its effects in the postoperative period of abdominoplasty remain limited. This non-randomized clinical trial included 31 female patients undergoing abdominoplasty, divided into two groups: PBM intervention (n = 15) and control (n = 16). Salivary samples were collected at three time points: preoperative (T0), 48 h postoperative (T1), and 7 days postoperative (T2). Inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-10), oxidative stress indicators (TBARS, nitrites), and pain scores were assessed. PBM was applied once using an 808 nm infrared laser (100 mW, 3 J/point) before hospital discharge. Statistical analyses included the Shapiro-Wilk test, Friedman test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's correlation, and multiple linear regression. PBM did not produce statistically significant changes in TNF-α, IL-10, nitrites, or pain scores compared to the control group. However, a statistically significant reduction in TBARS levels was observed at 48 h postoperatively in the unadjusted analysis (p = 0.040), although this effect was not maintained after adjustment for baseline variability. Physical activity was associated with lower nitrite concentrations (p = 0.047), indicating a modulatory interaction between exercise and nitric oxide metabolism. Although a single session of PBM did not significantly alter most inflammatory and oxidative markers, the intervention was well tolerated during the postoperative period. These preliminary findings support the safety of PBM during postoperative recovery after abdominoplasty, although larger randomized trials are required to confirm its potential clinical benefits. Limitations include small sample size, single-session PBM, lack of sham control, and no correction for multiple comparisons. Further randomized studies with larger sample sizes and multiple applications are warranted to better elucidate its therapeutic potential.

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyLow-Level Light TherapyAdultFemaleHumansInterleukin-10Middle AgedOxidative StressPilot ProjectsPostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodSalivaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaWound HealingInterleukin-10Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAbdominoplastyCytokinesLow-level laser therapy (LLLT)Oxidative stressPhotobiomodulation therapyPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID42631884
PMCPMC13499719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.