Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631873›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2026

Impact of reducing aligners' wear schedule from 7-days to 3-days on the predictability of tooth movement and treatment efficiency: a randomized controlled trial.

Alexandra Brown, Maya Rifai, Kiana Saadatmand, Kelin Zhong, Chia-Ling Kuo, Flavio Uribe, Calogero Dolce, Sarah Abu Arqub

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra BrownPrivate Practice Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA.
Maya RifaiDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kiana SaadatmandDivision of Orthodontics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kelin ZhongConnecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, UConn Health Farmington, Farmington, CT, USA.
Chia-Ling KuoConnecticut Convergence Institute for Translation in Regenerative Engineering, UConn Health Farmington, Farmington, CT, USA.
Flavio UribeDivision of Orthodontics -Department of Craniofacial Sciences, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.
Calogero DolceDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sarah Abu ArqubDepartment of Orthodontics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. super_orthodontist@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TRIAL

designThis was a two-arm, parallel-group, single-blinded, single-center prospective randomized controlled trial conducted between October 2023 and March 2025.

participantsThirty-eight adults aged 18-30 years with Class I malocclusion and moderate-to-severe mandibular anterior crowding were included, recruited from a university orthodontic clinic. Forty-five participants were initially randomized; seven were excluded due to non-compliance.

interventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to a 3-day aligner wear protocol with reduced activation (0.11 mm/1° per tray) or a conventional 7-day protocol (0.25 mm/2° per tray).

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of reducing the aligner wear schedule from 7 days to 3 days on the predictability of linear and angular tooth movements for the mandibular incisors. OUTCOME: The primary outcome was the deviation between predicted and achieved mandibular incisors' tooth movement following the first aligner series, assessed across three linear and three angular dimensions. RANDOMIZATION: Participants were allocated using fixed block randomization with concealed sequentially numbered envelopes. BLINDING: Outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation.

resultsLinear deviations were comparable between groups and within the 0.5 mm ABO clinical threshold. Statistically significant angular deviations were observed for teeth 31 (p = 0.040) and 41 (p = 0.003), with additional significant buccolingual inclination for tooth 41 (p = 0.005); none exceeded the 2° clinical threshold. The 3-day group required significantly more refinement and clinical visits. No significant differences were observed in overall treatment duration or final occlusal outcomes. No adverse effects were reported.

conclusionsWhile both protocols produced comparable occlusal outcomes, the 3-day protocol required more refinements and visits without improved predictability, suggesting wear duration plays a key role in aligner effectiveness.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov xxxx.

Indexed as

Malocclusion, Angle Class IOrthodontic Appliances, RemovableTooth Movement TechniquesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultClear alignersClinical outcomesPredictabilityWear schedule

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.