ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Atypical notochordal cell tumors: an alternative diagnosis when diagnostic criteria are not straightforward : Short title: atypical notochordal cell tumor.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumors with notochordal differentiation are categorized into two distinct entities in the latest WHO classification: benign notochordal cell tumor (BNCT) and chordoma. Previously, atypical notochordal cell tumor (ANCT) has been described for lesions that exhibit radiological and morphological features that deviate from BNCT and do not meet the criteria for chordoma. We present the clinicopathological and radiological findings of eight ANCT cases along with follow-up data. M: F was 2:6, with a mean age of 37 years. Tumors were located in the clivus (n = 3), coccyx (n = 3), thoracic vertebra (n = 1), and cervical vertebra (n = 1). The mean tumor size was 2 cm. Radiologically, features such as cortical erosion (n = 5), minimal soft-tissue extension (n = 3), and a predominant soft-tissue location (n = 2) were atypical. Morphologically, none of the tumors showed prominent cytological atypia or lobular growth. Only two cases exhibited focal minimal myxoid change, and one case showed focal necrosis. Previous diagnoses included chordoma (n = 3), ANCT (n = 3), and BNCT (n = 2). All patients are alive, with follow-up periods ranging from 2 months to 20 years (median 7.5 years), and there is no evidence of disease progression. We recommend using the term "atypical notochordal cell tumor" for tumors that do not fully meet the morphological and radiological criteria for BNCT or chordoma. This approach aims to ensure close patient follow-up and prevent unnecessary, extensive medical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42631851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.