ArticlePituitary2026
Evaluation of endothelial dysfunction in women with prolactinoma.
Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimProlactinoma has been associated with impaired glucose metabolism and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the metabolic effects of hyperprolactinemia and its impact on endothelial function, as well as changes following treatment.
methodsTwenty patients with prolactinoma and 15 age- and BMI-similar healthy controls were included. All participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to assess glucose and insulin responses. Endothelial function was evaluated using carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and flow-mediated dilation (FMD) measured by Doppler ultrasonography, along with echocardiographic assessment. In patients, all measurements were repeated after six months of treatment, once prolactin levels normalized.
resultsThe mean age of patients was 26.9 ± 7.4 years with a BMI of 25.1 ± 5.6 kg/m². Patients had higher 120-minute glucose levels during OGTT compared to controls (105.1 ± 24.2 vs. 90.5 ± 15.9 mg/dL, p = 0.015). Following treatment, both 120-minute glucose levels and area under the curve glucose were significantly reduced (p = 0.045 and p = 0.005, respectively). Echocardiographic parameters, including systolic and diastolic function, as well as CIMT, were similar between groups and remained unchanged after treatment. In contrast, FMD was significantly lower in patients at baseline compared to controls (6.81 ± 5.22% vs. 16.8 ± 2.59%, p < 0.001) and improved after cabergoline therapy (13.18 ± 5.78%, p = 0.003), indicating endothelial dysfunction and its reversal with treatment.
conclusionPatients with prolactinoma exhibit increased glucose intolerance and impaired endothelial function in the absence of overt global cardiac dysfunction. These alterations appear to be reversible following treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42631850What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.