Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631831›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026

Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Ophthalmic Regenerative Medicine: From Cell Replacement to Precision Engineering.

Bei Li, Le Ling, Ruixi Liu, Xin Zhang, Yifan Kang, Jinlin Guo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu First People's Hospital/ Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Sichuan Province, 610041, Chengdu, China. apeidou@qq.com.
Le LingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu First People's Hospital/ Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Sichuan Province, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Ruixi LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu First People's Hospital/ Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Sichuan Province, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu First People's Hospital/ Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Sichuan Province, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Yifan KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Integrated TCM & Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu First People's Hospital/ Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Sichuan Province, 610041, Chengdu, China.
Jinlin GuoKey Laboratory of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, Chongqing, Sichuan Province, China. guo596@cdutcm.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82575148Sichuan Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine Foundation 2021MS096Sichuan Provincial Nature Science Foundation from Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2025ZNSFSC0604University-Hospital Joint Innovation Foundation from Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine LH202402018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adipose‑derived stem cells (ASCs) have emerged as a promising cell source in ophthalmic regenerative medicine, attributed to their accessibility, differentiation potential, and paracrine functions. Despite compelling preclinical evidence, clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory. Departing from the conventional disease‑oriented categorization, this review adopts the cognitive evolution of ASC therapeutic mechanisms as its organizational thread, synthesizing evidence from 158 studies across six ophthalmic subspecialties. Four sequential paradigms are identified: (1) multilineage differentiation and cell replacement; (2) paracrine signaling and microenvironmental modulation; (3) extracellular vesicles and cell‑free therapy; and (4) engineering modifications and precision delivery. Cross‑disciplinary synthesis reveals a fundamental contradiction: the inherent capacity of living ASCs to sense and respond to local microenvironments directly conflicts with the pharmacological requirements for standardization and predictability. Five major translational bottlenecks are distilled, namely, the absence of functional potency standards, the rodent‑to‑human translational gap, insufficient therapeutic window studies, low‑level clinical evidence outside oculoplastics, and regulatory ambiguity. A corresponding roadmap is proposed, centered on functional potency evaluation, engineered cell‑free products, and an ophthalmic‑specific long‑term safety framework. This review provides a unified theoretical framework for contextualizing the prospects of ASC‑based therapies and offers strategic guidance to facilitate their clinical translation.

Indexed as

Adipose-derived stem cellsClinical translationExosome therapyOphthalmic regenerative medicineParacrine mechanismsParadigm evolution

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.