ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Development and validation of an automated MRI-based pipeline for temporal classification of intracerebral hemorrhage using U-Net segmentation and machine learning.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of breast-level surface dose between single-energy CT and fast kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT under matched CTDIvol conditions: a chest phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate an automated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based pipeline for temporal classification of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) using clinically feasible multi-sequence MRI, 2.5D U-Net segmentation, and machine learning. This retrospective study included a development cohort of 56 patients and an independent validation cohort of 115 patients with ICH. Five MRI sequences-diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient map, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, and susceptibility-weighted angiography-were analyzed. A pontine reference region of interest was automatically placed using FLAIR-based brain segmentation. Hematoma regions were automatically segmented using a 2.5D U-Net trained in the development cohort, and the largest three-dimensional connected component was defined as the representative hematoma region of interest. Pontine ROI-referenced signal features and shape features were extracted, and Random Forest, XGBoost, and multinomial logistic regression classifiers were compared for five-stage temporal classification. The selected final model was applied to the validation cohort. In the validation cohort, automated hematoma segmentation achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.794 ± 0.208, sensitivity of 0.799 ± 0.235, and precision of 0.842 ± 0.151. One case with automated hematoma ROI extraction failure was excluded from temporal classification analysis. In the remaining 114 cases, the final Random Forest model achieved an accuracy of 0.807, balanced accuracy of 0.763, macro F1-score of 0.749, and mean Average Precision of 0.851. The proposed automated MRI-based pipeline showed feasible performance for ICH temporal classification and may support objective MRI-based assessment of hemorrhage stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42631827What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.