Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631689›Full record

ReviewThe oncologist2026

Male breast cancer: from extrapolated practice to evidence-based care.

Bethina Liu, Alissa M Michel, Prabhjot S Mundi, Keith M Sigel, Susan E Bates, Yeun-Hee A Park

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bethina LiuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-3184-9174
Alissa M MichelDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0829-9804
Prabhjot S MundiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9871-4463
Keith M SigelDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, James J. Peters Bronx Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10468, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4051-4861
Susan E BatesDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-0330
Yeun-Hee A ParkDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9343-231X

Funding

Molecular Oncology Training ProgramT32CA203703 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Katherine D Crew, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute RT32 CA203703NCI NIH HHS T32 CA203703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast cancer (BC) comprises approximately 1% of all BC cases. Although incidence has increased over recent decades, male BC remains understudied, and its management continues to rely on evidence extrapolated from studies focused on female patients. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on male BC epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and male-specific considerations that may impact outcomes. Key risk factors include genetic susceptibility, particularly BRCA2 mutations, and conditions that promote hormonal imbalance and excess estrogen exposure, such as obesity and hepatic dysfunction. Men with BC are typically diagnosed later in life, with more advanced disease, and experience worse outcomes than women. Observational data demonstrate underutilization of guideline-recommended locoregional and systemic therapies across modalities among male patients, and uncertainties persist regarding systemic therapy choice and sequencing. The paucity of male-specific prospective data highlights the need to significantly improve male representation in future BC trials. Rigorous analyses of real-world evidence with careful attention to confounders are needed to better characterize current practice patterns, identify gaps in guideline adherence, and evaluate efficacies of systemic therapies.

Indexed as

Breast Neoplasms, MaleFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsBRCA2breast neoplasmsendocrine therapymalepatient participationreal-world evidencesex factors

Identifiers

PMID42631689
PMCPMC13521601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.