ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Local Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Topically-Applied Bimatoprost to the Scalp of Male Patients With Androgenetic Alopecia.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is one of the most common causes of hair loss in the male population, characterized by progressive baldness. This study was designed to evaluate the tolerability and local skin pharmacokinetics of bimatoprost in two different formulations in male subjects with AGA. Bimatoprost 1% Formulations A and B were applied topically once daily to the scalp and lateral trunk in the same subjects for 14 days. One skin biopsy from each application site was obtained on Day 14 after the final drug application. Eleven participants were dosed in this study, and their skin samples were analyzed for bimatoprost and its acid metabolite. Both formulations achieved at least a 10-fold higher bimatoprost concentration in subcutaneous fat, where the hair papilla is typically situated, than the in vitro concentration needed for maximal increased hair growth (42 ng/g) in isolated hair follicles. Both formulations showed a significant decrease in bimatoprost concentration with increasing distance from the skin surface as expected for a topically applied formulation with no significant differences between Formulations A and B. Bimatoprost acid concentrations in most samples were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.8 ng/g) for both formulations. All adverse events reported were mild except for increased serum transaminases in one participant, which was moderate and not considered treatment related. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in bimatoprost concentration between Formulations A and B in the epidermis/dermis layer of the scalp samples from the same study participants, with levels above efficacious concentrations. Treatment with bimatoprost 1% Formulations A and B was well tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.