Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631338›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2026

Multimodal Neuroimaging-Based Machine Learning Models Leveraging Cerebral Morphometry and Glymphatic Parameters Predict Short-Term Post-Programming STN-DBS Motor Response in Parkinson's Disease.

Yining Wang, Xin Zhang, Wenwen Yu, Yiyao Yang, Jiajun Cai, Juanjuan He, Huie Miao, Lingjuan Li, Liqin Lang, Jie Hu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yining WangDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9210-1552
Xin ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1480-6015
Wenwen YuInstitute of Science and Technology for Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-0090
Yiyao YangDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3470-5014
Jiajun CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Juanjuan HeDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Huie MiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Lingjuan LiDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liqin LangDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jie HuDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zengxin QiDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5206-9948
Liang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science and Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2373-5363

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFA1407800National Major Science and Technology Projects of China 2025ZD0215100National Natural Science Foundation of China 82271224National Natural Science Foundation of China 82571417Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality 25ZR1401042Natural Science Support Program of XPCC 2025DA060Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai municipality frontier innovation program 24DP3200600Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2018SHZDZX01SHANGHAI ZHOU LIANGFU MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION "Brain Science and Brain Diseases Youth Innovation Program"Special Program for Scientific and Technological Innovation of 3rd Division General Hospital of XPCC KY2025LCJZD03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesDeep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is effective for medication-refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms, but clinical response varies across symptom domains, particularly tremor and gait. Accurate preoperative stratification is clinically important, especially for early post-programming outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 155 patients with PD undergoing bilateral STN-DBS and 43 healthy controls. Preoperative structural magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging were used to quantify brain morphometry and glymphatic markers, including diffusion tensor imaging along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) and choroid plexus volume (CPV). Total motor response was evaluated in all 155 patients, tremor response in 133 patients with complete tremor subscores, and an exploratory data-driven gait-improvement phenotype in 66 patients with paired instrumented gait assessments. Machine-learning models were developed using fold-wise feature selection and hyperparameter tuning and were evaluated by fivefold cross-validation.

resultsBest-performing trimodal models yielded AUCs of 0.850 ± 0.045 (95% CI, 0.794-0.906) for total motor response, 0.861 ± 0.047 (95% CI, 0.803-0.919) for tremor response, and 0.970 ± 0.019 (95% CI, 0.946-0.994) for the exploratory gait-improvement phenotype. Morphometric-only models retained substantial predictive performance, with maximum AUCs of 0.830, 0.849, and 0.955 for the motor, tremor, and gait-related endpoints, respectively. For the exploratory gait phenotype, clinical-plus-morphometric and trimodal models performed similarly, suggesting limited incremental value of glymphatic variables in this subgroup.

conclusionPreoperative cerebral morphometry, complemented by selected glymphatic markers and baseline clinical variables, may help stratify short-term post-programming STN-DBS response in PD. These findings support further development of imaging-informed DBS outcome prediction, while external validation and longer-term follow-up remain necessary before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationGlymphatic SystemMachine LearningNeuroimagingParkinson DiseaseSubthalamic NucleusAgedDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective Studiesglymphatic parametersmachine learningmorphometricsParkinson diseaseSTN‐DBS

Identifiers

PMID42631338
PMCPMC13499007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.