ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics2026
From Routine Imaging to Risk Stratification: Multimodal Vision-Language Survival Modeling for Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently diagnosed in advanced stages, substantially limiting opportunities for early intervention. In this work, we present a multimodal survival modeling framework for prediagnostic PDAC risk stratification using routinely acquired clinical data, including abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging, radiology reports, and structured electronic health record (EHR) variables. Our first contribution is a unified multimodal framework that integrates heterogeneous clinical data sources for prediagnostic risk modeling. Second, to address the sparsity and heterogeneity of EHR data, we introduce text-based encoding of clinical variables, while volumetric variability in CT imaging is mitigated through automated pancreas detection and standardized subvolume selection. Third, we integrate a vision-language foundation model (VLM) with a survival modeling objective based on negative log-likelihood to estimate cancer-free survival. Model performance was evaluated on internal and external validation cohorts using the concordance index (C-index). Across cohorts, multimodal fusion generally outperformed unimodal approaches. Vision-language models demonstrated strong and consistent discriminative performance, while feature-engineered models achieved competitive performance, particularly on external validation. Overall, multimodal integration provided the most robust performance, highlighting the complementary value of combining imaging, text, and structured clinical data. Finally, to address interpretability challenges associated with VLM-based modalities, we conducted systematic ablation studies using modality-specific occlusion and noise perturbation to quantify the contribution of image and text features. These results support the feasibility of opportunistic PDAC risk stratification from routinely collected multimodal clinical data and underscore the potential of multimodal representation learning for early risk identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.