Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631277›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Device for the Creation of Micrografts: A Pilot Case Series.

Thomas A Davenport, Daniel A Grande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas A DavenportFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery and Microsurgery, NYU Long Island Hospital, New York, NY.
Daniel A GrandeOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research (Northwell Health), Manhasset, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Skin grafting is a standard treatment for full-thickness wounds. Split-thickness grafts perform well in compromised wound beds but create open donor sites, whereas full-thickness grafts allow primary closure but may have reduced graft take in chronic wounds. Morselizing full-thickness grafts into micrografts may improve imbibition and drainage while preserving the advantages of full-thickness skin and allowing for a closed donor site. This pilot study evaluates a novel skin morselization device (TissueMil) for preparing full-thickness skin micrografts for grafting chronic wounds. Methods: Ten patients with full-thickness wounds that had failed to improve after at least 4 weeks of standard care were treated with full-thickness skin micrografts processed using the TissueMil device. Elliptical grafts were harvested from the trunk or groin and closed primarily. Grafts were morselized into micrografts approximately 500-750 µm in size and applied to prepared wound beds. Patients were followed up to assess graft take, healing time, and donor site morbidity. Results: All treated wounds demonstrated 95%-100% graft take. Complete healing occurred within 21-98 days (2.5-14 wk). All donor sites healed within 2 weeks without infection or dehiscence. Procedures were performed in the outpatient setting under local anesthesia with an average duration of approximately 30 minutes. Conclusions: Full-thickness skin micrografts prepared with a novel morselization device achieved high graft take and reliable healing while allowing primary donor site closure. Device-assisted preparation may simplify clinical use of full-thickness micrografting. Larger controlled studies are warranted.

Identifiers

PMID42631277
PMCPMC13496304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.