ArticleArchives of plastic surgery2026
The Use of Dynamic Neck Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis in the Adjunctive Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease: A Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Archives of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep cervical lymphovenous reconstruction in Alzheimer's disease: three target-defined interfaces with distinct mechanistic implications.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) has recently emerged as a potential method for the symptomatic management of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Building on this, we conceptualize the "dynamic neck lymphovenous anastomosis" (DN-LVA) to illustrate the versatility of our technique. DN-LVA utilizes a vein graft that traverses through the sternocleidomastoid muscle to facilitate the drainage of lymphatic fluid from the deep cervical lymphatic vessels to the external jugular vein. Methods: This study presents a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent DN-LVA between November 2024 and January 2025. The clinical outcome was evaluated through positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging and cognitive assessment tools, which included Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). The vein graft was harvested from the lower limb. Results: Five subjects were recruited into this study. Postoperative PET/CT scans revealed up to a 6.9% increase in glucose metabolism in patient 3, a decrease of 12.3% in amyloid deposits, and a 4.7% reduction in tau deposits in patient 5 and patient 4, respectively. Clinically, MMSE and MoCA scores were improved by 1.8 and 1.4, respectively. NPI scores decreased by 5.8 across five overall, and the CDR remained unchanged in all subjects. All grafts demonstrated vessel patency, and no postoperative complications were observed. Conclusion: DN-LVA appears to be a safe, minimally invasive procedure with potential cognitive and metabolic benefits in AD. Further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.