ArticleInternational journal of integrated care
Implementation Barriers and Facilitators of an Integrated Care Initiative Targeting Socioeconomically Vulnerable Groups.
Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The incorporation of integrated care initiatives for socioeconomically vulnerable groups into standard care is rare. Insight into implementation barriers and facilitators to select strategies for further implementation and upscaling are therefore needed. Description: This study evaluated the implementation of an integrated care initiative adopting interprofessional collaborative practice of patient-centred care for citizens with prediabetes in the form of group consultations. Results: Key barriers included insufficient involvement of citizens in the design of the group consultations, which could be overcome by involving patients/consumers and family members in the design of the group consultations. Additionally, we identified a lack of embedding in the current healthcare and social support systems and fragmented financing systems as barriers. By developing a formal implementation blueprint, obtaining formal commitments, using other payment schemes, and developing resource sharing agreements, these barriers could be addressed. Finally, inadequate evaluation was identified as a barrier. This could be improved by capturing and sharing local knowledge and developing and organising a quality monitoring system. Key facilitators were the widespread enthusiasm for the concept of group consultations, a sense of urgency for change, and the adaptability of the initiative to the local context. Conclusion: Meaningful citizen involvement in the design of an integrated care initiative, such as group consultations, is a key determinant of implementation when targeting socioeconomically vulnerable groups. Although there is broad support for interprofessional collaborative practice, the organisational and governance structures required for their sustainable implementation remain underdeveloped.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.