ArticleJournal of plankton research
Seven years in formalin: the burden of metabarcoding mesozooplankton preserved in buffered formalin from the northern Adriatic Sea.
Article in Journal of plankton research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historical mesozooplankton collections preserved in formalin are valuable archives for reconstructing past biodiversity, but formalin-induced DNA damage has long limited their molecular use. We evaluated the feasibility of metabarcoding on mesozooplankton samples collected in 2017 from the northern Adriatic Sea and stored in 4% buffered formalin for approximately seven years at room temperature and dark conditions. We applied a hot alkaline lysis protocol to improve DNA recovery from formalin-fixed material and tested three metabarcoding markers differing in amplicon length and taxonomic resolution (COI, 18SV4, and 18SV9), using a bioinformatic pipeline adapted for highly degraded templates. The three markers performed differently. COI retained the strongest metazoan signal, while 18SV9 recovered the broadest metazoan diversity and showed the highest concordance with morphology. By contrast, 18SV4 was strongly biased toward non-metazoan amplification, with fungal reads dominating several samples. Of the 86 taxa identified by stereomicroscopy, COI recovered 16 taxa and 18SV9 recovered 59, with only nine shared between markers. These results show that samples preserved in buffered formalin for 7 years can still yield informative metabarcoding data, although taxonomic recovery is strongly shaped by marker choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.