ReviewJournal of pain research2026
Interventional Pain Procedures: A Narrative Review Focusing on Safety and Complications. Part 3 - Sympathetic and Ganglion-Targeted Techniques.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interventional procedures that target the sympathetic nervous system and specific autonomic and sensory ganglia are widely used for refractory visceral, neuropathic, and cancer-related pain. They can provide substantial, often durable analgesia but carry a small yet clinically important risk of serious adverse events. This is the third part of our narrative-review series on the safety of interventional pain procedures, following Part 1 (spinal pain injections) and Part 2 (procedures for back pain), both published in the Journal of Pain Research. It is a structured but non-systematic narrative review (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library; 1980-2026). We examine the complications of image-guided and neuroablative procedures directed at the trigeminal (Gasserian), sphenopalatine, stellate, thoracic sympathetic, celiac/splanchnic, lumbar sympathetic, superior and inferior hypogastric, and impar ganglia and plexuses; we outline the pharmacology of phenol and ethanol and compare them with conventional radiofrequency and cryoneurolysis. Most reported complications are mild, self-limiting, and physiologically predictable, such as hypotension, diarrhea, transient sensory change, and Horner syndrome. Serious events-paraplegia, spinal cord infarction, retropharyngeal hematoma, meningitis, visceral perforation, and anesthesia dolorosa-appear uncommon, but their true incidence remains uncertain and varies by procedure, and much of the evidence derives from isolated case reports. They reflect either anatomical proximity to critical neurovascular structures or unintended spread of the neurolytic agent. Across techniques, the determinants of safety comprise real-time image guidance, meticulous needle placement, incremental dosing, contrast confirmation, attention to anticoagulation status, and careful patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.