Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631221›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Interventional Pain Procedures: A Narrative Review Focusing on Safety and Complications. Part 3 - Sympathetic and Ganglion-Targeted Techniques.

Giuliano Lo Bianco, Maurizio Marchesini, Silvia Natoli, Carmelo Attilio Costa, Sean Li, Sudhir Diwan, Miles Day, Andrea Tinnirello, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Emanuele Piraccini and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giuliano Lo BiancoAnesthesiology and Pain Department, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2705-1548
Maurizio MarchesiniDivision of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Silvia NatoliDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3758-5375
Carmelo Attilio CostaPain Therapy and Interventional Pain Operational Unit, Anesthesia and Resuscitation Service, Humanitas Clinical Institute, Catania, Italy.
Sean LiNational Spine and Pain Centers, Shrewsbury, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-1179
Sudhir DiwanManhattan Spine and Pain Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1245-9033
Miles DayDepartment of Anesthesiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Andrea TinnirelloAnesthesia and Pain Management Unit, ASST Franciacorta, Iseo Hospital, Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2217-7942
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Emanuele PiracciniUnit of Pain Management, Emergency Department, AUSL Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alfonso PapaPain Department, AORN A. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4489-714X
Michael E SchatmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-0413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional procedures that target the sympathetic nervous system and specific autonomic and sensory ganglia are widely used for refractory visceral, neuropathic, and cancer-related pain. They can provide substantial, often durable analgesia but carry a small yet clinically important risk of serious adverse events. This is the third part of our narrative-review series on the safety of interventional pain procedures, following Part 1 (spinal pain injections) and Part 2 (procedures for back pain), both published in the Journal of Pain Research. It is a structured but non-systematic narrative review (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library; 1980-2026). We examine the complications of image-guided and neuroablative procedures directed at the trigeminal (Gasserian), sphenopalatine, stellate, thoracic sympathetic, celiac/splanchnic, lumbar sympathetic, superior and inferior hypogastric, and impar ganglia and plexuses; we outline the pharmacology of phenol and ethanol and compare them with conventional radiofrequency and cryoneurolysis. Most reported complications are mild, self-limiting, and physiologically predictable, such as hypotension, diarrhea, transient sensory change, and Horner syndrome. Serious events-paraplegia, spinal cord infarction, retropharyngeal hematoma, meningitis, visceral perforation, and anesthesia dolorosa-appear uncommon, but their true incidence remains uncertain and varies by procedure, and much of the evidence derives from isolated case reports. They reflect either anatomical proximity to critical neurovascular structures or unintended spread of the neurolytic agent. Across techniques, the determinants of safety comprise real-time image guidance, meticulous needle placement, incremental dosing, contrast confirmation, attention to anticoagulation status, and careful patient selection.

Indexed as

cancer painchemical neurolysiscomplicationsethanolganglion neurolysisinterventional pain proceduresphenolradiofrequency ablationsafetysympathetic block

Identifiers

PMID42631221
PMCPMC13496135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.