ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2026
Impact of mentorship on the learning curve of unilateral biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a cumulative sum analysis across 2 generations of surgeons.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Unilateral biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (UBE-ULBD) is a minimally-invasive yet technically demanding procedure for lumbar spinal stenosis. Aim: This study aimed to compare the learning curves of 2 generations of surgeons performing UBE-ULBD under a structured mentorship model. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 200 consecutive surgeries performed between January 2020 and June 2024. The first-generation surgeon (FGS) performed all procedures independently. The second-generation surgeon (SGS) assisted in 30 surgeries and then received on-site supervision for the first 15 independent cases. Data on operative time, blood loss, complications, and clinical outcomes, including the Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index, were collected. Operative time-based cumulative sum analysis was used to evaluate the learning curves. Results: The FGS achieved proficiency after 37 and the SGS after 29 procedures. The SGS had significantly shorter mean (SD) operative time of 127.6 (13.2) vs 137.1 (19.3) minutes and lower blood mean (SD) loss of 49 (13.6) vs 57.7 (20.6) milliliters, as compared with his first-generation counterpart. Complications and clinical outcomes were comparable. After achieving proficiency, both surgeons showed improved efficiency without differences in safety or outcomes. Conclusions: Under the guidance of the FGS, the SGS achieved proficiency in UBE-ULBD more rapidly, as reflected in the shorter operative time. Moreover, once proficiency was reached, no notable differences were observed between the 2 surgeons in terms of postoperative complications or clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.