ArticleApplications in plant sciences
Fun-sized library prep: Miniaturization is a valid method for per-sample cost reduction in targeted sequencing of angiosperm DNA.
Article in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fun-sized library prep: Miniaturization is a valid method for per-sample cost reduction in targeted sequencing of angiosperm DNA.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premise: Genomic analysis of population structure is important for understanding plant genetic diversity among and within populations. A limitation to the broader application of genetics in conservation and related fields is the cost of obtaining large datasets. Targeted sequencing and low-volume robotic liquid handlers can reduce library preparation reaction volumes and costs. Methods: We used targeted sequencing via Angiosperms353 to obtain data for 768 samples, 18 of which were identical, at 0.5× and 0.1× reaction volumes. We calculated quality and quantity control statistics to compare the effects of tissue age and library reaction volume on sequencing results for on-target nuclear and off-target plastid genes. Results: Library miniaturization to 0.1× reduces costs and generally performs comparably to 0.5× libraries. In the full dataset, Tenth-Volume Only libraries showed smaller insert sizes and fewer genes with mapped sequences, but no reduction in mapped reads. In the Overlap Set, 0.1× libraries had equal or improved performance with no significant decrease in sequencing efficiency. Differences by tissue type likely reflected sampling variation. Discussion: Miniaturization to 0.1× substantially reduces per-sample costs while maintaining comparable sequencing quality across fresh and herbarium angiosperm DNA. Overall, miniaturization provides a reliable, cost-effective approach for targeted sequencing, increasing the feasibility of using herbarium collections and enabling broader access to population-level genomic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.