Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631195›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Cardiac Rehabilitation Adherence and Long-Term Outcomes Post Myocardial Infarction: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient Motivation, Barriers, and Program Satisfaction.

Akshaya D Ramachandran, Keertana Shivamaru, Shilpa Deoke, Drashti D Vaddoriya, Mangala S Lalithamani, Mohit Agrawal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Akshaya D RamachandranNephrology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Pondicherry, IND.
Keertana ShivamaruMedicine, Sapthagiri Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, IND.
Shilpa DeokeGeneral Medicine, NKP Salve Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre and Lata Mangeshkar Hospital, Nagpur, IND.
Drashti D VaddoriyaMedicine, Gujarat Cancer Society (GCS) Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mangala S LalithamaniFamily Medicine, Mediora Smart Clinic, Kozhikode, IND.
Mohit AgrawalPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SS Agrawal Institute of Physiotherapy and Medical Care Education, Navsari, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Participation in a cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program is a key component of secondary prevention following myocardial infarction (MI). However, adherence to CR varies considerably and may influence functional recovery and short-term clinical outcomes. Understanding the factors that facilitate or hinder participation may help optimize rehabilitation programs and improve patient outcomes. This prospective mixed-methods study assessed the association between adherence to CR and clinical outcomes four months after MI and explored the motivational factors, perceived barriers, and patient experiences influencing adherence. Materials and methods A prospective mixed-methods study was conducted among 150 post-MI patients who were followed for four months after enrolment. Participants were categorized according to CR adherence as high (>80% attendance; n = 87, 58%), moderate (50%-79%; n = 36, 24%), or low (<50%; n = 27, 18%). Quantitative outcomes included functional capacity assessed using the six-minute walk test (6MWT), medication adherence, recurrent myocardial infarction, and rehospitalization. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews exploring perceived health benefits, barriers, motivators, and patient satisfaction. Quantitative data were analyzed using comparative statistical methods, while qualitative interviews underwent thematic content analysis. Results High adherence to CR was associated with significantly greater improvement in functional capacity (mean increase: 120 ± 25 m) compared with the moderate-adherence (65 ± 20 m) and low-adherence (30 ± 15 m) groups (p < 0.001). Recurrent myocardial infarction during the four-month follow-up occurred in 6% of participants in the high-adherence group compared with 19% and 30% in the moderate- and low-adherence groups, respectively (p < 0.05). Rehospitalization rates were also lower among participants with high adherence (10%) than among those with moderate (22%) or low adherence (37%) (p < 0.05). Qualitative analysis identified perceived health benefits, family support, and positive interactions with healthcare professionals as important facilitators of adherence, whereas financial constraints, occupational commitments, greater travel distance, transportation-related difficulties, and limited awareness of CR were the principal barriers. Higher satisfaction with the rehabilitation program was observed among participants with high adherence. Conclusion Higher adherence to CR was associated with improved short-term functional recovery and lower rates of recurrent myocardial infarction and rehospitalization during the four-month follow-up period. The mixed-methods findings indicate that both personal and health system factors influence adherence. Strategies that improve patient education, accessibility, family support, and patient-centered delivery of CR programs may help enhance adherence and optimize recovery following MI.

Indexed as

adherencebarrierscardiac rehabilitationlong-term outcomesmyocardial infarctionpatient motivationprogram satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID42631195
PMCPMC13495950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.