SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Virtual reality for reducing pain, anxiety, and distress in children, adolescents, and young adults with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Needle-related procedures are a significant source of pain, anxiety, and distress for children with cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) as a distraction intervention for reducing these outcomes in pediatric oncology patients undergoing needle-related procedures. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and CINAHL was conducted from database inception to March 23, 2026. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of VR (immersive or non-immersive) compared to standard care or active distraction in pediatric oncology patients (aged ≤21 years) undergoing needle-related procedures. The primary outcome was self-reported pain. Secondary outcomes included parent-reported pain, nurse-reported pain, self-reported fear, parent-reported fear, nurse-reported fear, self-reported anxiety, parent-reported anxiety, distress, procedure duration, and heart rate. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Results: Ten RCTs enrolling 536 participants were included. VR significantly reduced self-reported pain (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = -0.99, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: -1.37 to -0.61, p = 0.001, I² = 71.7%), parent-reported pain (SMD = -1.10, 95% CI: -1.66 to -0.54, p < 0.001, I² = 83.6%), and nurse-reported pain (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI: -1.92 to -0.08, p = 0.025, I² = 80.0%). Significant reductions were also observed in self-reported fear (Weighted Mean Difference [WMD] = -1.10, 95% CI: -1.50 to -0.70, p < 0.001, I² = 58.0%), parent-reported fear (WMD = -1.31, 95% CI: -1.58 to -1.03, p < 0.001, I² = 7.1%), nurse-reported fear (WMD = -1.15, 95% CI: -1.55 to -0.75, p < 0.001, I² = 0.0%), self-reported anxiety (SMD = -1.06, 95% CI: -1.63 to -0.49, p = 0.002, I² = 79.9%), parent-reported anxiety (SMD = -1.59, 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.95, p < 0.001, I² = 51.5%), and distress (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.67 to -0.03, p = 0.032, I² = 19.6%). VR also significantly shortened procedure duration (WMD = -0.76 minutes, 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.19, p = 0.009, I² = 0.0%) but had no significant effect on heart rate (WMD = 1.57, 95% CI: -3.51 to 6.64, p = 0.544, I² = 80.3%). The overall risk of bias was low risk for five studies, some concerns for four studies, and high risk for one study. Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that VR may reduce pain, fear, anxiety, and distress and may shorten procedure duration in pediatric oncology patients undergoing needle-related procedures. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because several outcomes were based on few small trials and substantial heterogeneity was present. Larger multicenter RCTs are needed before routine implementation can be recommended. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42026134853.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.