ReviewApplications in plant sciences
Techniques and challenges in studying photosynthetic diversity in freshwater submerged vascular plants.
Review in Applications in plant sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing our understanding of photosynthesis: discoveries and insights from aquatic plants.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027Review
- Developing carbon assimilation methods in duckweed for insights into photosynthesis and growth mechanisms.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Techniques and challenges in studying photosynthetic diversity in freshwater submerged vascular plants.Applications in plant sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While the photosynthetic diversity of aquatic plants rivals that of terrestrial species, the environmental conditions underlying that diversity fundamentally differ. Despite these environmental differences, aquatic and terrestrial plants have convergently evolved carbon concentrating mechanisms (CCMs). However, characterization of these pathways in submerged plants has lagged behind terrestrial systems due to methodological constraints of the aquatic environment. Here we review and evaluate contemporary methods for detecting CCMs in aquatic plants. Physiological methods, including gas exchange and isotopic analyses, provide valuable insights into terrestrial plants but face significant challenges in aquatic systems. Biochemical assays of organic acid accumulation reliably detect CCMs in aquatic species but may struggle to detect weak or non-canonical CCMs in submerged plants. Gene expression assays of canonical CCM pathway genes may provide a sensitive tool for characterizing photosynthetic diversity in a wide range of aquatic species. While the methods and frameworks developed for terrestrial plants do not necessarily directly translate to aquatic systems, extending these methods and integrating multiple lines of evidence can improve our ability to characterize photosynthetic diversity in aquatic plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.