ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Personalized
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Drug-induced cardiotoxicity remains a leading cause of drug development failures and market withdrawals. Despite advances in preclinical testing, current Methods: We simulated concentration-dependent effects of amiodarone across combinations of hERG and Nav1.5 alleles in five human cardiac cell types: endocardial, epicardial, midwall, Purkinje, and atrial cells. APD90 values were evaluated across all cell types, whereas qNet was calculated in ventricular cells only to assess genotype and cell type dependent differences in electrophysiological response and torsadogenic risk. Results: Our results highlight how genetic variations and cell type context influence electrophysiological response to amiodarone, uncovering high-risk profiles otherwise masked in population-averaged models. These simulations reveal key insights with translational and regulatory relevance: genetic background meaningfully alters drug response; midmyocardial cells are disproportionately vulnerable; the same mutation can produce different effects across cell types; Purkinje cells may serve as silent proarrhythmic substrates; and celltype- specific differences in APD90 and qNet may provide additional insight beyond APD prolongation alone, and consequently improve prediction of torsades de pointes risk. Conclusion: Our work provides a foundation for the creation of digital twin models that incorporate patient-specific electrophysiology, offering a scalable platform for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.