ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2026
Impact of stress on EEG functional connectivity during procedural learning.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In a procedural learning environment, trainees acquire skills for managing life-threatening emergencies, a context that inherently elicits stress. While moderate stress can enhance memory consolidation, excessive stress (distress) may impair learning and performance. Here we elucidated the neurophysiological effects of stress on learners during a procedural learning task. Methods: We examined the effects of stress on learning by assessing EEG functional connectivity (FC) in medical trainees during endotracheal intubation. The cohort comprised medical trainees who were monitored at baseline (rest) and during two high-fidelity simulation scenarios: a calm condition and a stressful condition (intubation during anesthesia induction). Concurrent data were collected, including heart rate, eye blinks and self-reported measures of perceived stress and cognitive load. Results: High-fidelity simulation reliably provokes a physiological stress response, predominantly mediated by sympathetic nervous system activation. Across conditions, FC increased relative to baseline, indicating heightened neural network synchronization during task engagement. Notably, under the stressful condition, FC was further elevated compared with the calm scenario, suggesting that stress within a defined range may enhance neural communication efficiency and learning capacity. Conclusions: These findings imply a potential neurophysiological signature of stress that could be leveraged to design personalized educational interventions, calibrating stress levels to optimize learning while mitigating deleterious effects. Significance: The study demonstrates the feasibility of using real-time EEG to monitor stress-related neural dynamics in medical trainees and underscores the importance of integrating neurophysiological insights into the development of training environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.