ReviewCureus2026
Effects of Scapulothoracic Physical Therapy on Shoulder Function in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adhesive capsulitis (AC), also known as frozen shoulder (FS), is a common debilitating condition characterized by progressive pain, severe restriction of the shoulder range of motion (ROM), and functional disability. While conventional physical therapy remains the cornerstone of conservative management, the additional benefit of interventions specifically targeting the scapulothoracic joint has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether physical therapy targeting the scapulothoracic joint provides a measurable additive benefit over conventional therapy in patients with AC, with emphasis on pain, shoulder ROM, disability, and scapular kinematics. We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EBSCO, ProQuest, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases without any year restrictions. Following a thorough, systematic screening by two independent reviewers, nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 466 participants met our inclusion criteria. A random-effects model was used to conduct meta-analysis. The GRADE framework was used to assess the certainty of evidence. The pooled analysis showed no statistically significant between-group difference in pain (SMD = -0.28; 95% CI -1.11 to 0.54). However, scapulothoracic interventions significantly improved shoulder flexion ROM (SMD = 0.57; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.98; p < 0.05) and functional disability as measured by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) (SMD = -0.87; 95% CI -1.55 to -0.19; p = 0.012), with a GRADE certainty rated high for the SPADI finding. Effects on abduction and external rotation ROM were positive but could not reach statistical significance. Sensitivity analyses restricted to low-risk-of-bias and studies with some concerns confirmed the robustness of the flexion result and revealed a significant abduction effect (SMD = 0.68; p = 0.029) that was obscured in the primary analysis. These findings support the inclusion of scapulothoracic interventions into physical therapy programs for AC. Future high-quality RCTs with larger samples and standardized protocols are needed to consolidate these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.