Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631072›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

A framework for siting public EV charging during renewable-aligned hours.

Nicolas Williams, Salomon A Mendoza, Esteban A Lopez Ochoa, Kristen E Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas WilliamsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Chemical Engineering, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Salomon A MendozaSchool of Architecture + Planning, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Esteban A Lopez OchoaSchool of Architecture + Planning, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Kristen E BrownSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering, and Construction Management, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilities must incorporate electric vehicle (EV) charging demand alongside variable generation. Early EV adopters relied on home charging, creating evening loads poorly aligned with solar. Existing demand-side management strategies often rely on time-of-use pricing or automated control, which can limit equitable access. As public charging is deployed, location selection may support charging when solar is abundant. This study develops a replicable, data-driven framework to identify candidate locations for public EV charging based on the overlap between observed visitation and grid-favorable charging hours. The preferred time period for charging in Texas is from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. Using mobile phone location data for a case study in San Antonio, the framework identified over 100 candidate locations with visitation patterns aligned with this window. Promising locations include retail centers, financial institutions, and lunch-oriented restaurants. Rather than optimizing charger operation after deployment, the framework provides a siting approach to align public charging with demand-side management goals.

Indexed as

demand-side managementduck curveelectric vehiclesEV charging stationsEVs

Identifiers

PMID42631072
PMCPMC13495402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.