Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42631039›Full record

ArticleGlobal challenges (Hoboken, NJ)2026

Second-Life Lithium-Ion Batteries for Circular Energy Systems: A Techno-Economic and Environmental Pathway to Affordable Grid-Connected Renewable Storage.

Abdelhak Lekbir, Bessam Deboucha, Abdullahi Mohamed Samatar, Saad Mekhilef, Kok Soon Tey, Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian, Khalid Alqunun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdelhak LekbirDepartment of Computer System & Technology Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-4107
Bessam DebouchaPower Electronics and Renewable Energy Research Laboratory (PEARL) Department of Electrical Engineering Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9916-806X
Abdullahi Mohamed SamatarDepartment of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Hormuud University Mogadishu Somalia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-3635
Saad MekhilefPower Electronics and Renewable Energy Research Laboratory (PEARL) Department of Electrical Engineering Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8544-8995
Kok Soon TeyDepartment of Computer System & Technology Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology Universiti Malaya Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6018-3978
Mehdi SeyedmahmoudianSchool of Engineering Swinburne University of Technology Hawthorn Victoria Australia.
Khalid AlqununDepartment of Electrical Engineering College of Engineering University of Ha'il Ha'il Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-8231

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid electrification of transportation is generating a growing stream of retired electric vehicle batteries, creating challenges in battery waste management and the provision of affordable energy storage for renewable energy integration. Repurposing these batteries for stationary applications offers a circular-economy solution that addresses both issues. This study evaluates the techno-economic and environmental viability of integrating containerized second-life lithium-ion batteries (SLBs) into a grid-connected hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) for a residential community in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Using HOMER Pro, four configurations incorporating either new or second-life batteries were compared. The results show that the HRES-4 configuration reduces grid dependency by more than 54%, transforms the system into a net energy exporter (>820 MWh/year), and achieves the best economic performance, with a net present cost of $239.6K and a levelized cost of storage of $0.072/kWh. Despite higher degradation rates, SLBs deliver energy throughput and cycling performance comparable to new batteries, exceeding 207 MWh/year and 230 equivalent full cycles annually. SLB integration also avoids approximately 1161 tons of CO

Indexed as

circular energy economygrid‐connected storagehybrid renewable energy systemlevelized cost of storagesecond‐life lithium‐ion batteriestechno‐economic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42631039
PMCPMC13495060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.