ReviewBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2026
Fracture strength of CAD/CAM glass fiber post-and-cores: a systematic review.
Review in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives/Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth with extensive coronal tissue loss often require post-and-core restorations to provide retention and support for definitive restorations. Recent advances in computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology have enabled the fabrication of customized glass fiber post-and-core systems with improved adaptation to root canal anatomy. However, evidence regarding their fracture strength remains inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the fracture strength of CAD/CAM-fabricated glass fiber post-and-core systems, compare their performance with that of other post systems, and identify the factors influencing their fracture strength. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251038278). Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library in January 2025 and updated in February 2026. Studies evaluating the fracture strength of CAD/CAM glass fiber post-and-core systems were included. Data regarding study characteristics, materials, testing methods, aging procedures, fracture strength outcomes, failure modes, and principal findings were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified CONSORT checklist adapted for in vitro studies. Results: A total of 17 studies met the eligibility criteria. Fracture strength values varied considerably according to material composition, testing protocols, and experimental conditions. CAD/CAM glass fiber post-and core systems generally demonstrated fracture strength comparable to cast metal and other contemporary post systems. Improved adaptation to root canal anatomy and thinner cement layers were consistently reported. Although some materials exhibited higher fracture strength values, CAD/CAM glass fiber posts were frequently associated with more favorable and repairable failure modes. Conclusions: CAD/CAM-fabricated glass fiber post-and-core systems represent a promising alternative to conventional post systems, providing fracture strength comparable to established restorative options while promoting more favorable failure behavior. However, methodological heterogeneity among studies highlights the need for standardized testing protocols and further clinical investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.