ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Long-Term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Implant Failure After Distal Femoral Megaprosthesis in Orthopaedic Oncology: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is a standard reconstruction technique following malignant bone tumor resection, yet long-term outcomes and implant-related complications remain insufficiently reviewed. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 88 patients who underwent DFR for malignant or aggressive benign tumors from 1990 to 2023. The cumulative incidences of implant revision, removal, or amputation were estimated using competing risk analysis with death as a competing event. Risk factors for major reoperation were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Over a median follow-up of 8.0 years, 71 reoperations were performed in 41 patients (30 major and 41 minor). The cumulative incidence of implant removal or revision was 19.8% at 5 years, 36.8% at 10 years, and 52.2% at 20 years. Type 4 complications (infection) were the most common cause of failure, including late-onset infections occurring more than 10 years postoperatively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of a residual epiphyseal plate (hazard ratio: 4.17, Conclusions: DFR provides durable long-term outcomes, though the risk of revision persists beyond 10 years, primarily due to infection. Residual epiphyseal plate presence is a significant risk factor for implant failure. Complex surgical procedures were not independently associated with implant failure in the adjusted analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.