ArticleiScience2026
Functional genomics in
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Compound heterozygous DAW1 variants reveal tissue-specific roles in left-right patterning and congenital heart disease without primary ciliary dyskinesia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital heart disease (CHD) remains a major cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality, yet many patients lack a genetic diagnosis. Two studies identified rare deletions in ARHGAP10 (GAP10), a Rho GTPase-activating protein at 4q31.2 in individuals with heterotaxy and atrial septal defects, highlighting GAP10 as a new candidate CHD gene; however, the function of GAP10 has not been investigated. We demonstrate that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.