ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Tumor immunosenescence drives breast cancer progression and therapeutic resistance: mechanisms and emerging interventions.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. While immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed treatment for a subset of patients, durable responses remain limited, in part because the tumor immune microenvironment is profoundly shaped by age-associated immune decline-termed immunosenescence. In this review, we critically synthesize how tumor immunosenescence may contribute to breast cancer progression and therapeutic resistance, distinguishing correlative observations from mechanistically established relationships. We examine T cell senescence and exhaustion as mechanistically separable states with distinct therapeutic implications, and evaluate the roles of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) as orchestrators of immunosenescence through SASP production, immune exclusion, and metabolic remodeling. We discuss subtype-specific immunosenescence signatures (TNBC, HER2+, HR+), hormonal and menopausal influences, stage-dependent immune alterations, and BRCA-associated susceptibility. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP)-comprising IL-6, IL-8, TGF-β, and matrix metalloproteinases-serves as a central mediator linking cellular senescence to immune evasion and metastatic dissemination, though much of the evidence derives from preclinical models. Therapy-induced senescence following chemotherapy and radiotherapy may paradoxically drive relapse through SASP-mediated immunomodulation, a hypothesis that lacks prospective clinical validation. We review clinical evidence that aging is associated with diminished interferon signaling, reduced tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density, and altered checkpoint blockade efficacy in some but not all studies, acknowledging substantial inter-patient heterogeneity. We highlight recent advances in single-cell and spatial profiling technologies and discuss challenges in biomarker standardization and clinical implementation. Finally, we evaluate emerging interventions-senolytics (navitoclax, dasatinib plus quercetin, fisetin), senomorphics, metabolic rescue via NAD+ repletion, STING agonists, and rational senotherapy-immunotherapy combinations-emphasizing that most remain at preclinical or early clinical stages. We conclude that targeting tumor immunosenescence represents a promising but incompletely validated therapeutic axis for enhancing anti-tumor immunity in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.