Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630843›Full record

ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Center2026

Cytoskeletal dynamics in breast cancer: mechanistic insights and therapeutic opportunities.

RamaRao Malla, Anshu Tumbali, Pavani Chode, Krithika Manda, Anuveda Sree Samudrala, Yerusha Nuthalapati, Charanteja Mangam, Priyamvada Bhamidipati, Mundla Srilatha, Ganji Purnachandra Nagaraju

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the National Cancer Center, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

RamaRao MallaCancer Biology Group, Cancer Biology Laboratory, Dept of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anshu TumbaliDepartment of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Pavani ChodeDepartment of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Krithika MandaDepartment of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anuveda Sree SamudralaCancer Biology Group, Cancer Biology Laboratory, Dept of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Yerusha NuthalapatiCancer Biology Group, Cancer Biology Laboratory, Dept of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Charanteja MangamCancer Biology Group, Cancer Biology Laboratory, Dept of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Priyamvada BhamidipatiCancer Biology Group, Cancer Biology Laboratory, Dept of Life Sciences, GITAM School of Science, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Mundla SrilathaDepartment of Biotechnology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Ganji Purnachandra NagarajuSchool of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance are intricately linked to the cytoskeletal dynamics. The cytoskeleton, a central hub of cellular architecture, is composed of three primary filament systems: microtubules (MTs), actin filaments (AFs), and intermediate filaments (IFs). These filaments are not passive scaffolds but active, integrated systems that govern the processes of cell division, invasion, and migration, thereby providing the direct mechanistic basis for tumor growth, metastasis, and therapy resistance. Therefore, this review examines the pivotal roles of MTs, AFs, and IFs in mediating drug resistance by adapting to the breast cancer (BC) microenvironment (BC-ME). This review summarizes recent insights into how key signaling pathways, such as PAKs (p21-activated kinases), FAK (Focal adhesion kinase), and the ARF (ADP-ribosylation factor) signaling, regulate actin dynamics, focal adhesion turnover, and cytoskeletal organization. Furthermore, the review highlights the control of microtubule (MT) assembly and stability by microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), detailing the distinct contributions of tumor suppressors, such as ATIP3 and Tektins, and oncogenes, including MASTL and Tau. Aberrations in the pathways controlling cytoskeletal dynamics and MAP expression significantly contribute to metastatic potential and resistance to conventional therapies. Emerging therapeutic strategies targeting specific cytoskeletal regulators, including PAKs, FAK, and MASTL inhibitors, are discussed as promising approaches to mitigate resistance and metastasis. Furthermore, targeting ARF has been highlighted as a potential means to sensitize TNBC cells to EGFR inhibitors. Finally, a cytoskeleton dynamics-based 3P medicine approach for breast cancer was discussed. Future perspectives emphasize the development of specific inhibitors, the establishment of robust predictive biomarkers (e.g., ATIP3, TEKT4 variants, Tau levels), the exploitation of vulnerabilities created by MAP alterations, and the rational optimization of combination therapies to overcome resistance and improve BC treatment outcomes, especially in aggressive subtypes like TNBC.

Indexed as

3P medicineBreast cancerCytoskeletal dynamicsDrug resistanceMetastasisTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID42630843
PMCPMC13494631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.