ArticleJournal of mood and anxiety disorders2026
How observing others influences the subsequent acquisition of fear of bodily sensations.
Article in Journal of mood and anxiety disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Observational fear learning preceding a first-hand learning experience is assumed to potentially sensitize individuals, resulting in greater fear acquisition. In a laboratory setting, we therefore investigated how different demonstrator responses to temporary dyspnea influence consecutive direct fear acquisition. 74 participants were randomly assigned to three experimental groups. In the two observational learning groups, participants observed a demonstrator completing an interoceptive differential fear conditioning paradigm, during which one of two visual cues (conditioned stimuli, CS) was paired with temporary dyspnea for the demonstrator, displaying either a calm, non-fearful or a fearful response to the unconditioned stimulus (US). Participants of the control condition saw the similar setup with no demonstrator being present. Then, the three groups completed a differential direct fear conditioning paradigm with first-hand temporary dyspnea as the US. During observational learning, observers of any demonstrator, but not the control condition, acquired significant contingency knowledge, indicated by greater US-expectancy in response to CS + vs. CS -. During direct acquisition, participants of all groups showed significant fear learning, indicated by greater US-expectancy, skin conductance responses and startle response magnitudes to CS + vs. CS -. Although fear responses decreased in these measures, significant CS + /CS - differences were maintained upon the end of extinction. Evaluating the effect of the different demonstrators, exploratory analyses revealed that startle response potentiation to CS + vs. CS - was only present in the fearful demonstrator group during acquisition. Although preliminary in nature, this suggests that the acquisition of fear of interoceptive threat may be facilitated by preceding observational learning from a fearful demonstrator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.