Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630824›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2026

Sex differences in propofol-induced loss of consciousness: a clinical study on effect-site concentration and electroencephalographic features.

Yu Mao, Liying Zhu, Qingwei Wei, Ziqing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu MaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230036, Anhui, China.
Liying ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230036, Anhui, China.
Qingwei WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230036, Anhui, China.
Ziqing HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hefei 230036, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSex differences in propofol sensitivity have been reported, but their characterization remains inconsistent, particularly regarding their electroencephalographic (EEG) correlates. This study aims to elucidate sex-specific responses to propofol-induced loss of consciousness and to identify associated pharmacodynamic and EEG biomarkers for informing individualized clinical dosing.

methodsFifty-four surgical patients (28 males/26 females) undergoing elective procedures were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Using the Schnider pharmacokinetic model, we administered target-controlled infusion of propofol with precise effector compartment targeting. Synchronized recordings of effect-site concentration (Ce) and prefrontal EEG activity were obtained at loss of consciousness (LOC) thresholds.

resultsPharmacodynamic analysis revealed a significant reduction in Ce of propofol at LOC in females compared with males (3.1 vs 4.0 μg·ml

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that females exhibit greater sensitivity to propofol-induced unconsciousness, as evidenced by a lower effect-site concentration, distinct enhancements in alpha and delta oscillations, and modified high-frequency coherence. These biomarkers offer robust evidence for sex-specific propofol dosing strategies, improving precision in anesthesia depth management and potentially mitigating overdose and awareness risks in female populations.

Indexed as

effect-site concentrationelectroencephalogramindividualized anesthesiapropofolSex

Identifiers

PMID42630824
PMCPMC13495644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.