Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630819›Full record

ArticleACS engineering Au2026

Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids through a Vortex-Based Hydrodynamic Cavitation Device.

Mukesh Upadhyay, Jai Rathod, Vivek V Ranade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS engineering Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mukesh UpadhyayMultiphase Reactors and Intensification Group Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.
Jai RathodMultiphase Reactors and Intensification Group Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.
Vivek V RanadeMultiphase Reactors and Intensification Group Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-6971

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is being increasingly used for a variety of industrially relevant processes such as biomass pretreatment, emulsions, and crystallization. Many of these processes involve non-Newtonian fluids. However, most of the previous studies on characterizing flow in cavitating devices focus on low-viscosity, Newtonian fluids. In this study, we investigate the influence of non-Newtonian, particularly shear-thinning behavior of fluids on the flow characteristics and cavitation inception in a vortex-based hydrodynamic cavitation device (VD) using both experiments and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Primary digestate from an anaerobic digester was considered as a model non-Newtonian fluid, considering increasing applications of HC devices for biomass pretreatment. The non-Newtonian behavior was represented using the Carreau rheological model. The parameters of the model were obtained via rheological measurements over a shear rate range of 10 to 1300 s

Indexed as

cavitating flowscavitation inceptionCFDpressure dropshear-thinning fluids

Identifiers

PMID42630819
PMCPMC13495670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.