ArticlePEC innovation2026
Motivational interviewing training for community mental health providers: Findings and lessons learned from three related studies.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to test innovative Motivational Interviewing (MI) training strategies: remote workshop and avatar conversation simulations among community mental health staff. Innovation: Researchers provided an engaging, interactive tool for learning and practicing MI to a variety of real-world practitioners and compared two methods for measuring skills: automated scoring from avatar simulations and coded interviews using the validated Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) tool. Methods: Attitudes, beliefs, and MI skills of 127 practitioners implementing three distinct research projects were examined: ACHIEVE-D (weight loss); IMPACT (tobacco smoking cessation); and RHYTHM (CVD risk reduction). Results: 95% of participants believed MI was important to learn; 88% completed the workshop; 64% used the avatar-based training. Practice improvements were modest and inconsistent over time across the three projects. While underutilized, 47 participants (75%) who tried the avatar training at least once felt that it helped develop their skills. Conclusions: Community mental health practitioners value learning MI. Their engagement with the asynchronous avatar training resources was insufficient and did not meaningfully improve their observed MI skills. Although a novel feature of the avatar-based training, the automated conversation scoring appeared to overestimate performance for all MI metrics relative to MITI scores at the same time points.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.