ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Development and validation of an early screening tool for young children with autism spectrum disorders: the checklist for Chinese toddlers with autism.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate the Checklist for Chinese Toddlers with Autism, a culturally adapted early screening tool for autism spectrum disorder in children aged 12-24 months. The scale was developed by synthesizing early ASD symptom characteristics, reviewing international screening instruments, incorporating interviews with 15 medical professionals, and consulting eight experts in developmental behavioral pediatrics, child psychology, and psychometrics. The final scale comprises three dimensions (reciprocal social behaviors, social communication, interest behaviors and sensory perception) and 20 items assessed via behavioral observation. Initial validation involved 809 children (aged 12-24 months) to evaluate reliability and validity of the scale, and then determine a cutoff point to differentiate the severity levels of ASD. Further, the scale was applied in 4786 children from the neighborhood child health care clinics to test the screening value of the checklist. The results indicated that a cutoff score of 12 yielded optimal performance, with high sensitivity (0.95) and specificity (0.82). Community-based screening confirmed its efficacy in distinguishing between high likelihood and low likelihood children for ASD. Preliminary evidence indicates that the Checklist for Chinese Toddlers with Autism exhibits sound psychometric properties and may serve as an early screening tool for Chinese children with ASD aged 12-24 months, however, external validation is still required to establish its generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.