Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630775›Full record

ArticleAnnals of vascular diseases2026

Discrepancy between the Radiographic Screening by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Histopathologic Diagnosis of Vascular Malformations.

Makoto Shiraishi, Kou Fujisawa, Yoichi Yasunaga, Yuta Moriwaki, Yukako Shibasaki, Haesu Lee, Tetsuo Ushiku, Osamu Abe, Mutsumi Okazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of vascular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Makoto ShiraishiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kou FujisawaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichi YasunagaDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta MoriwakiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukako ShibasakiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Haesu LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuo UshikuDepartment of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Osamu AbeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mutsumi OkazakiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used to evaluate extracranial vascular anomalies (VAs), its diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively assessed MRI accuracy for VAs and identified nonvascular lesions mimicking them. Patients who underwent surgical resection for suspected VAs at a tertiary referral center in Japan between April 2019 and June 2025 were analyzed. Results: A total of 172 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean age 34.9 ± 18.8 years; 62.8% female). Lesions were most commonly located in the extremities (54.1%), followed by the head and neck (32.6%) and the trunk (13.4%). Histopathology identified venous malformations (VMs) as the most frequent subtype (73.8%), followed by arteriovenous malformations (AVMs; 11.0%) and lymphatic malformations (LMs; 6.4%). MRI showed moderate sensitivity and high specificity: AVM sensitivity 0.68 and specificity 0.99; VM sensitivity 0.70 and specificity 0.98; LM sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.98. Seven cases (4.1%) were ultimately diagnosed as non-VA lesions despite MRI findings suggestive of VAs. Common mimickers included angioleiomyoma and myopericytoma. Conclusions: MRI demonstrates moderate sensitivity and strong specificity for VAs, although false-positive interpretations remain an important consideration.

Indexed as

arteriovenous malformationlymphatic malformationmagnetic resonance imagingvascular malformationsvenous malformation

Identifiers

PMID42630775
PMCPMC13494577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.