ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026
Ontogenetic Change in Performance: Do Innovations Constrain Performance in Gobiid Fishes?
Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent innovations in a species may expand opportunities to obtain new resources or previously inaccessible habitats. Over time, the novel behavior may diversify in response to an adaptive landscape or become canalized by convergent selective pressures into a narrowed performance window. Selective pressures also change across life stages, which may further enhance diversification or constrain performance. To test these alternative hypotheses, we compared ontogenetic changes in the performance of a novel locomotor behavior-waterfall-climbing-across five amphidromous species of gobiid fishes from the Pacific, Caribbean, and Indian Oceans. Two species climb waterfalls using an inching motion, a derived functional innovation that alternates movements of pelvic and oral suckers. The remaining species climb waterfalls using short "powerbursts" of swimming, followed by long rest periods in which the pelvic sucker is attached to the waterfall substrate. Among adults, net climbing speed (including rest) was similar across the three powerburst species and one inching species, but a derived, faster speed was observed in one inching taxon, suggesting greater functional diversity in the younger innovation. However, kinematic data indicate that similar performance levels can be achieved through multiple functional pathways. Moreover, patterns of functional diversity across species observed in juveniles do not track neatly into adulthood, highlighting the range of potential influences that can shape the trajectory of ontogenetic change in function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.