Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630728›Full record

ReviewOncology research2026

Targeting Cytoskeleton and Cell Motility: Past and Novel Strategies for Cancer Therapy.

Lucrezia Paradisi, Lorenza Trabalzini, Federica Finetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucrezia ParadisiDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Lorenza TrabalziniDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Federica FinettiDepartment of Biotechnology, Chemistry and Pharmacy, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytoskeletal reorganization is fundamental to essential cellular processes, including shape maintenance, migration, adhesion cytokinesis, and phagocytosis, and its dysregulation is a hallmark of tumor progression. In cancer cells, altered cytoskeletal dynamics promote invasion and genomic instability resulting from mitotic defects. The actin and microtubule cytoskeletons are highly dynamic polymer networks that organize intracellular architecture, establish polarity, and generate the mechanical forces required for cell division and motility. Their dysregulation disrupts normal cell behavior and facilitates tumor invasion and metastasis. The cytoskeleton therefore represents a key source of potential therapeutic targets for inhibiting metastatic dissemination. This review focuses on recent anticancer strategies targeting cytoskeletal and motility-associated pathways, including microtubule-directed agents, actin-modulating compounds, inhibitors of focal adhesion signaling, modulators of intermediate filament dynamics, and regulators of cytoskeletal crosstalk. Collectively, these strategies underscore the central role of cytoskeleton in cancer progression and highlight its potential as a promising therapeutic target.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell MovementCytoskeletonNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansMicrotubulesMolecular Targeted TherapySignal TransductionAntineoplastic Agentsantimetastatic drugscancer cell motilityCancer therapycytoskeletonmetastasismicrofilament targeting agentsmicrotubule targeting agents

Identifiers

PMID42630728
PMCPMC13494506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.