ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Pharmacokinetics, safety and population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics analysis of meropenem-vaborbactam in Chinese healthy participants.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meropenem-vaborbactam is a fixed-dose β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination active against carbapenem-resistant Methods: This single-center, open-label study included 20 healthy participants divided into two groups receiving meropenem-vaborbactam (1:1) at 1 g/1 g or 2 g/2 g via 3-h infusion. Plasma and urine concentrations of meropenem, its open-ring metabolite, and vaborbactam were analyzed using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. PK analysis was conducted using WinNonlin. Monte Carlo simulations were used to evaluate the 1 g/1 g and 2 g/2 g regimens administered every 8 h as 3-h intravenous infusions. For the standard 2 g/2 g regimen, the impact of extending the infusion duration from 3 to 4 h was further evaluated based on the FDA-recommended PK/PD target. Results: Plasma concentrations of meropenem, its open-ring metabolite, and vaborbactam peaked immediately after infusion, with rapid distribution and elimination. Exposure increased proportionally with dose, and almost no accumulation was observed after repeated 8-hourly dosing. Most meropenem (68.5%-77.0%) and nearly all vaborbactam were excreted unchanged in urine. Both single and multiple doses were well tolerated, with no severe or serious adverse events. In addition, PK/PD analysis showed that, for CRE isolates, the standard 2 g/2 g every 8 h regimen with a 3-h intravenous infusion achieved ≥90% probability of target attainment for meropenem (45% Conclusion: The standard meropenem-vaborbactam regimen (2 g/2 g every 8 h, 3-h intravenous infusion) demonstrated favorable PK and safety profiles, with PK/PD analyses supporting the appropriateness of the standard regimen in Chinese participants, consistent with global findings. These results provide PK/PD support for the standard regimen and warrant further evaluation in Chinese patients with CRE infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.