ArticleBJUI compass2026
Combining PSA density and imaging data with transcript markers from urinary cells to improve prediction of prostate cancer reclassification in patients on active surveillance.
Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate selected transcripts from urinary cells regarding their potential to predict risk reclassification in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS). Patients and methods: Urine samples were prospectively collected from 74 patients before control biopsy and immediately processed to obtain urinary cells. A panel of 29 PCa-associated transcripts with PPIA, RPLP0 and TBP as reference genes was determined by quantitative PCR following multiplexed reverse transcription of RNA with a pre-amplification step. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses including the calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) were conducted to assess the predictive ability for reclassification of the respective parameters. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors suitable for combination. Results: Overall, 31 patients (42%) showed PCa risk reclassification (defined by ISUP group 1 with PSA > 10 ng/mL or ISUP group 2-5 with any PSA level) at control biopsy. The AUC values and accuracies of PSA, PSA density, PSA velocity and maxPI-RADS for indicating PCa risk reclassification ranged between 0.738 and 0.767 and 66% and 73%, respectively. Of the investigated transcripts, a predictive potential could be shown for MALAT1, MCL1, NEAT1, STAT3 and STAT5B (AUC = 0.622-0.713, accuracies 64%-73%). A model combining PSA density, maxPI-RADS and the transcript MCL1 resulted in an AUC of 0.828 with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 58%, 93% and 78%, respectively. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential of urinary transcripts, particularly in combinations with clinical parameters, for the non-invasive monitoring of PCa during AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.