Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630583›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2026

Contraceptive use and unfulfilled preferences among women ages 15-49 years in the United States, 2022-2023.

Mia R Zolna, Doris W Chiu, Megan L Kavanaugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mia R ZolnaResearch Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York.
Doris W ChiuResearch Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York.
Megan L KavanaughResearch Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To update estimates of, and examine the intersection between, method-specific contraceptive use and unfulfilled contraceptive preferences for US women ages 15-49 years since multiple events (e.g., 2019 Title X Final Rule, COVID-19 pandemic) disrupted reproductive health access in the United States. We situate findings within the changing health policy climate and broader evidence base. Design: This secondary analysis uses the recently available 2022-2023 National Survey of Family Growth, a cross-sectional population-based household survey of US women ages 15-49. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify associations between individual's characteristics, method-specific contraceptive use, and unfulfilled contraceptive preferences. Subjects: The full sample of female respondents ages 15-49 (n = 5,586) and subsamples: all contraceptive users including permanent female method users (n = 3,163), contraceptive users and single-method users-both excluding those using only permanent female methods to address data constraints (n = 2,564 and n = 1,861 respectively), and contraceptive nonusers (n = 1,451). Exposure: None. Main Outcome Measures: Current contraceptive use, method-specific use accounting for multiple methods, and unfulfilled contraceptive preferences because of cost. Results: In 2022-2023, 57% of women (42.8 million) reported currently using contraception for any reason. The most common methods were oral contraceptive pill (23%), condom (21%), female permanent methods (20%), withdrawal (19%), and intrauterine device (16%). One-quarter (22%) of users reported multiple methods. Thirteen percent of users preferred a different method, and 31% of nonusers preferred to start a method, if cost were not a worry. Higher levels of unfulfilled contraceptive preferences among users were associated with identifying as a sexual minority (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.63; confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.27) and among nonusers younger than age 40 (aOR = 1.58-2.26; CI: 1.02-4.85) or not married or cohabiting (aOR = 2.49; CI: 1.68-3.69). Among single-method users, 23% using coital-dependent methods, 11% using short-acting methods, and 7% using long-acting methods, reported unfulfilled contraceptive preferences. Conclusion: Most US women used their preferred contraceptive method; however, barriers remain. Although trend analyses were not feasible because of changes in survey design, unfulfilled preferences were lower compared with other population-level studies; the extent to which this represents true shifts or shifts in data quality remains unclear. Healthcare systems grounded in sexual and reproductive equity and that reduce costs are needed to increase access to preferred methods.

Indexed as

contraceptive preferencesContraceptive useNational Survey of Family GrowthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42630583
PMCPMC13494620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.