Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630565›Full record

ReviewPatterns (New York, N.Y.)2026

Brain-AI convergence: Generative world models and hierarchical attention for human intelligence.

Shogo Ohmae, Keiko Ohmae

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shogo OhmaeBeijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 102206, China.
Keiko OhmaeBeijing Institute for Brain Research, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 102206, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in general-purpose AI provide new insights into how the neocortex and cerebellum, despite their uniform circuit architectures, support diverse functions and human intelligence. Beyond the traditional focus on visual processing, this paper offers a cross-domain comparison of the brain and AI through the lens of world-model-based computation. We argue that both the neocortex and cerebellum predict future world states from past inputs and construct predictive world models through prediction-error learning. These predictive world models are repurposed for sensory comprehension and motor output generation, thereby supporting multi-domain capabilities. Underlying these capabilities and even human-like adaptive intelligence, the neocortex implements hierarchical attention-based processing. Interestingly, autoregressive generative models in transformer-based AI have independently converged on similar computational principles. Together, these shared mechanisms suggest a common computational foundation through which uniform circuits can support cross-domain high-level intelligence in both biological and artificial systems.

Indexed as

cerebellumcortexin-context learninginternal modellanguage processinglarge language modelsmirror neuron systemprediction-error learningpredictive codingtransformer

Identifiers

PMID42630565
PMCPMC13494634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.