ArticleEnvironmental health insights2026
Household Food Handling Practices and Associated Factors Among Adult Women in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study Design.
Article in Environmental health insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foodborne illness poses a serious threat to public health in low-income countries. This study aims to assess the household food-handling practices of adult women in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia, and to examine associated factors. Methods: A community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted from May 20 to June 19, 2024, and 636 women were randomly selected to participate. Data on socio-demographic, behavioral, and environmental factors were collected using a standardized, pretested questionnaire. Composite indices for knowledge, attitude, and practice were created, with scores of 70% or higher considered good performance. Both binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. To assess model fit, we used the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, which yielded a p-value of 0.72, and calculated the variance inflation factor, which was less than 2.5. Results: Overall, 53.8% of individuals (95% CI: 49.9-57.6) handled food safely. Good practice was significantly associated with higher education (AOR: 4.22, 95% CI: 2.11-8.44), marriage (AOR: 4.25, 95% CI: 2.05-8.79), good knowledge (AOR: 2.30, 95% CI: 1.49-3.54), a positive attitude (AOR: 2.52, 95% CI: 1.23-5.16), and access to proper food-handling information (AOR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.90-5.56). Conclusion: Although more than half had good food-handling practices, substantial gaps remain in knowledge, attitudes, and environmental conditions. Improving women's access to food-handling information and strengthening behavioral change interventions are suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.