ReviewAmerican journal of translational research2026
Advances in mechanical ventilation for critically ill patients: strategies for respiratory support and complication management.
Review in American journal of translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation is essential for supporting critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure, especially those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In recent years, the focus of mechanical ventilation has shifted from simply improving gas exchange to implementing strategies that protect both the lungs and other organs. Lung-protective ventilation strategies - specifically low tidal volume ventilation and airway pressure limitation - have been shown to improve patient outcomes and are now considered standard care. More recent studies have emphasized the importance of driving pressure, individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration, and lung recruitability assessment in optimizing ventilation. Methods such as prone positioning, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy, and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) have further expanded options for respiratory support. Simultaneously, emerging concepts such as patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI), patient-ventilator asynchronies, and diaphragm dysfunction have enhanced our understanding of ventilator-related pathophysiology. Nonetheless, mechanical ventilation remains associated with various complications, including ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW), and delirium. Effective prevention and management of these complications require an integrated approach, encompassing lung-protective ventilation, optimized sedation, early mobilization, and standardized weaning protocols. The potential of advanced monitoring and supportive technologies, such as electrical impedance tomography, esophageal pressure monitoring, closed-loop ventilation systems, and AI-assisted decision-making, continues to evolve. This review summarizes recent advances in clinical mechanical ventilation, including its underlying mechanisms, associated complications, and current prevention and treatment strategies, which may serve as references for the care of critically ill patients requiring respiratory support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.