Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630495›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Evaluation of Radioiodine (I-131) Therapy Success in Different Etiological Forms of Hyperthyroidism and Analysis of Response According to Administered Dose.

Salih Azabagic, Adna Mujkic, Ilma Nur Azabagic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salih AzabagicDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, BIH.
Adna MujkicDepartment of Histology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, BIH.
Ilma Nur AzabagicCollege of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, BIH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadioactive iodine (I-131) has been used for decades in the treatment of hyperthyroidism. However, the final outcome depends not only on the underlying etiology but also, to a large extent, on the initial administered activity.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the success rates of radioiodine therapy in Graves' disease, toxic multinodular goiter (Plummer's disease), and toxic adenoma, and to precisely assess the impact of different I-131 activities on the risk of treatment failure.

methodsThe study included 146 patients with a clearly established etiology of hyperthyroidism. Each patient received one of four fixed activities: 10 mCi, 15 mCi, 20 mCi, or 25 mCi. Treatment outcome was evaluated six months after therapy using multinomial logistic regression (reference categories: 25 mCi dose and toxic adenoma).

resultsThe overall cure rate was 80.82%. In patients with Graves' disease, success was achieved in 78.38% of cases, with the majority developing hypothyroidism. The effect of dose was highly significant: an activity of 15 mCi increased the odds of persistent hyperthyroidism 57-fold (p < 0.05), while 10 mCi increased it 1,491-fold (p < 0.01) compared to 25 mCi. Patients with Plummer's disease had 18.36 times higher risk, and those with Graves' disease had 6.09 times higher risk of treatment failure compared to toxic adenoma (p = 0.11 and p = 0.29).

conclusionDoses below 20 mCi, particularly 10 mCi, are associated with unacceptably high failure rates. Multinodular and diffuse forms of hyperthyroidism require higher ablative activities between 20 and 25 mCi.

Indexed as

fixed-dose activityhyperthyroidismplummer’s diseaseradioiodine (i-131) therapytreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID42630495
PMCPMC13494488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.