Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42630453›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2026

Prediction of Outcome of Labour Induction: Comparison of Transvaginal Sonographic Parameters with Bishop Score.

Sutharsika Thiyagalingam, Dasari Papa, Sasirekha Rengaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sutharsika ThiyagalingamDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JIPMER, Puducherry, 605006 India.ORCID 0009-0008-7171-9537
Dasari PapaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JIPMER, Puducherry, 605006 India.
Sasirekha RengarajDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, JIPMER, Puducherry, 605006 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Induction of labour (IOL) is a necessary intervention in 20% of pregnancies to prevent maternal or fetal complications. Successful IOL depends on pre-induction cervical status, traditionally assessed using Bishop Score (BS). This study compares the predictive ability of transvaginal sonographic (TVS) parameters like cervical length (CL), posterior cervical angle (PCA), occipital position (OP) compared to BS for successful IOL and vaginal delivery (VD). Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted at tertiary care center, JIPMER, Southern India. A total of 131 primigravidae at 38-42 weeks with singleton vertex presentation underwent IOL werincluded. TVS was used to measure CL and PCA before induction. Induction was primarily achieved using transcervical Foley catheters, prostaglandins, and oxytocin. Outcome measures included achieving active labour (≥ 4 cm dilation) within 24 h, IOL-to-delivery interval (< 48 h), and successful VD. Results: Successful IOL was achieved in 93.1% of cases, and VD occurred in 79.4%. TVS parameters were superior to BS in predicting outcomes. CL < 2.8 cm and PCA ≥ 110° showed better sensitivity (72.7 and 73.7%) and diagnostic accuracy (79.3 and 77.9%) than BS. PCA ≥ 110° was the single best predictor of VD within 48 h (AUC 0.90, Conclusion: Sonographic parameters (CL and PCA) demonstrate higher predictive validity for successful IOL and VD compared to BS. PCA ≥ 110° emerged as the strongest independent predictor for delivery within 4 h, suggesting the utility of TVS in routine pre-induction assessments.

Indexed as

Bishop scorecervical lengthLabour inductionPosterior cervical angleSonographic parameters

Identifiers

PMID42630453
PMCPMC13493641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.